155 comments

Samsung KS8000 SUHD 4K Ultra HD Smart LED TV Review (UN49KS8000,UN55KS8000, UN65KS8000)

by on April 9, 2016
Details
 
Manufacture
Overview

Price: $1,797.99 - $2,799.99 on Amazon

Samsung’s 4K SUHD HDR TVs with quantum dot color technology in its second generation name are here and they are looking like excellent purchase choices, as we saw with our earlier review of the top-shelf KS9000 2016 SUHD HDR 4K TV. Here we’re going to look carefully at the KS8000, which is one of the “lower-end” cousins of the KS9000 and KS9500 flagship models. In the case of this particular model however, the “lower-end” aspect is definitely muted, with mostly minor differences between the core display and smart TV specs in the KS8000 and its pricier cousins the KS9500/KS9000 TVs.

Most notably, a few extra features for local dimming, motion rate technology and speaker power are what’s a bit weaker in the case of this particular model. The majority of the other differences are either aesthetic or superficial. Furthermore, unlike the KS9500, some versions of the KS9000 (apparently) and the KS8500, the KS8000 is a flat screen 4K TV, something which we ourselves appreciate more than the gimmick that is screen curvature in normal-sized 4K TVs of any kind.

The Good

Unlike the KS9000 2016 SUHD TV, which could mostly be considered a close successor to last year’s JS9000 SUHD model, the KS8000 doesn’t quite have a straightforward 2015 counterpart. However, this is largely unimportant anyhow since this particular lower-priced model easily outshines 2015 SUHD versions like the JS8500 and even the highly acclaimed JS9000 in terms of some crucial display specs.

Despite its smaller price, the KS8000 still offers the same essential HDR technology as its pricier 2016 cousins and easily outdoes any of the 2015 SUHD models (except maybe the flagship JS9500) in terms of how well it renders peak brightness and black levels. Other key features like quantum dot color, which was called Nano Crystal color in 2015’s SUHD TVs, are superb in this particular TV and arguably perform as well as they do in even the 2016 flagship SUHD TV, the JS9500.

Furthermore, like all of the 2016 SUHD TVs, the KS8000 complies with the “Ultra HD Premium” standards for both color and HDR from the UHD Alliance , so regardless of this model’s lower price, you’re going to get 10-bit color, superb 1000+ nit peak brightness and some deep rich black tones by LCD TV standards. This is a major bonus of all the 2016 SUHD TVs which was lacking in the 2015 lineup, even though some of those older models did have a lower grade species of HDR technology in their displays as well.

Additionally, the KS8000 benefits from a mix of Samsung’s better than ever before upscaling technology for non-4K content, augmented still further from 2015 by an ability to also impart exceptional brightness and black level enhancements to conventional non-4K SDR video sources of most types. In other words, all that majority of Full HD, 720p and even some well-mastered SD content you watch on the KS8000 will likely look much richer and crisper than it would on any normal HDTV or even on many 4K TVs for that matter.

Some other final strengths of the KS8000 which we also have to like include a great functionality in its Game mode, a better than ever Tizen smart TV platform with great intuitiveness and ease-of-use and a physical design that’s quite beautiful, front and back, with elegance and minimal quarter inch bezeling along the display edges.

Check the Price of the Samsung Electronics UN55KS8000FXZA 55" 4K Ultra HD 240MR Smart LED TV on Amazon

0.0 - No Reviews

The bad

On the other hand, being a far from completely perfect 4K LCD TV, the KS8000 has its share of flaws, though none of them are in any way major deal breakers by any means.

For starters, while some consumers won’t care about this it all, other potential users might seriously be bothered by the fact that Samsung hasn’t included any 3D support of either the passive or active type in any of its 2016 SUHD TVs, the KS8000 being no exception. If you’re used to enjoying some 3D in your home entertainment and can’t live without the technology in your 4K TV, stay away from the 2016 SUHD models then.

Secondly, like its pricier cousin the KS9000, the KS8000 also comes with problems with viewing angles. We personally don’t think the angle viewing is as bad as some have claimed it to be but it’s certainly not great, with the TV’s non-IPS display panel causing a notable amount of color and contrast loss at wider off-center angles. Additionally, some of the display “enhancement” technologies crammed into this and other newer 4K TVs, like Samsung’s AutoMotion Plus, don’t so much improve picture quality as they simply saturate it with odd gimmicks that sound better in marketing language than they do in actual practice. It’s a shame that these technologies are often turned on by default, but it’s often better to manually deactivate them after taking the KS8000 out of its box.

We should also note that the KS8000, being the “lower-end” edition of the new 2016 SUHD KS models, does not feature the slightly superior “Supreme UHD Dimming” or “Supreme Motion Rate 240Hz” technologies of the KS9500 or KS9000. These are minor absences though and even without Supreme UHD Dimming, the TV still performs superbly at local dimming and contrast richness.

Finally, while the contrast on the KS8000 is as good as it is in most 2016 HDR TVs and quite a bit better than almost any levels of HDR we’ve seen in nearly any 2015 4K UHD TV, LCD technology still has a ways to go before it matches the perfect blacks of OLED TVs like LG’s 4K models. The KS8000 may excel at brightness but neither it nor any other LCD 4K TV can yet match what OLED offers for precision local dimming and perfect black.

Final Thoughts

Our final thoughts on the KS8000 are the same as those we had for the KS9000. If you haven’t yet bought an HDR TV and were thinking of going for one of Samsung’s SUHD models, then definitely go for this one or its slightly more expensive KS9500/KS9000 cousins. They’re a definite improvement over their 2015 cousins in terms of color and contrast display. However, if you already have a 2015 SUHD or other high-end 4K TV and don’t care too much about having the latest in “Ultra HD Premium” HDR technology quite yet, you can forego this particular model comfortably. It’s nearly identical to its 2015 cousins when it comes to non-display specs.

Specs

• Screen size: 48.5 diagonal inches, 54.6 diagonal inches (UN55KS8000FXZA) and 64.5 diagonal inches (UN65KS8000FXZA)
• Smart TV: Tizen OS, Smart Hub, Smart TV with Apps and Full Web Browser
• HEVC (H.265) Included: Yes
• VP9 Included. Yes
• HD to UHD upscaling: Yes
• HDCP 2.2 Compliance: Yes
• Refresh Rate: 120Hz native refresh rate (Motion Rate 120Hz)
• Screen Lighting: Edge-lit LED backlighting with Supreme Dimming tech
• Resolution: 3,840 x 2,160 pixels UHD
• Wireless Connectivity: Yes, includes both built-in WiFi and Ethernet port
• Remotes: Samsung smart button remote
• Connectivity: 4 HDMI 2.0a ports, 3 USB ports, 1 Ethernet port, 1 Audio Out, 1 Digital Audio Out
• Sound: 40W (10W x 2, Woofer 10W x 2) Down Firing w/Bass Reflex (2.1CH) speakers with Dolby Digital Plus
• Contrast Ratio: 4,998:1
• Black Level maximum: 0.022 cd/m2
• Other Display Features: Auto Depth Enhancer and Ultra Clear Panel technology
• Processor: Quad-core

Highlights

Quantum Dot Color: Like its 2015 SUHD cousins, the KS8000 and the rest of the 2016 SUHD models all offer Quantum Dot color technology once again. Samsung has changed its name from NanoCrystal Color to the more descriptive Quantum Dot Color this year but its essentially the same system of ultra-thin layers of quantum dot crystal particles inserted between LED backlight and LCD screen for polarizing light from the LEDs themselves into different broad color patterns, which then further augment the color palette created by the KS8000’s pixels for deeper vibrancy and color realism. The QD color technology of the KS8000 nicely complements the color enhancements of the TV’s HDR specs.

UHD Premium High Dynamic Range: All of the 2016 SUHD TVs offer up HDR capacity that matches the standards set out by the UHD Alliance. This means that with the KS8000 and all of the other TVs in the series, you get your hands on peak brightness levels of 1000 nits, rich black levels of at least 0.05 nits (great by LCD TV standards) and full-blown 10-bit color processing. Of the 2015 SUHD TVs, only the JS9500 was able to match these brightness and black level specs, with the other HDR SUHD TVs like the JS9000 and JS8500 offering a much more limited form of HDR. This is in fact the single most stand-out aspect of the KS8000 and its cousins and what most makes them worth buying over their 2015 counterparts. HDR1000 is the main name that Samsung has given to this technology, though it also includes enhancements like Peak Illuminator Pro and Ultra Black, as well as UHD Dimming technology.

Peak Illuminator Pro and Ultra Black: While not quite as great as the Peak Illuminator Ultimate found in the KS9500 and KS9000 TVs, the Peak Illuminator Pro of the KS8000 is what most works at creating the peaks of nit brightness the TV is capable of. With the KS9000 we saw spot peak brightness hit as many as 1450 nits thanks to Peak Illuminator Ultimate and in the KS8000, while not reaching quite that high, spot brightness can still hit well above 1100 nits. In any case, this is the minimal peak brightness standard for effective “premium” HDR from the UHD Alliance. As for Ultra Black, it works with the TV’s UHD Dimming technology to create the riches possible black levels currently possible in an LCD TV like this model. In the case of the KS8000, those blacks are good indeed, capable of reaching below 0.05 nits of darkness.

Smart TV Improvement:s The 2016 version of the Tizen Smart TV OS is definitely at least a bit better than it was in 2015, and we liked the 2015 Smart Platform, considering it to be the second best on the market today. Now, in the KS8000 and other 2016 SUHD models, Tizen offers a slightly more intuitive user interface, superior point and click capacity in the still somewhat limited “smart” remote and we think that the quad core processor for this year has done a good job of enhancing the speed at which the whole smart platform operates.

Check the Price of the Samsung Electronics UN55KS8000FXZA 55" 4K Ultra HD 240MR Smart LED TV on Amazon

0.0 - No Reviews

Visual Specs

Quite frankly, all of the occasional above complaints about it aside, the visual specs of the KS8000 are nothing short of excellent, not just for an LCD TV but also even when compared to OLED if its peak brightness is taken into account.

For starters, the KS8000 has that handy Ultra HD Premium certification from the UHD Alliance behind it, so you can be fairly sure that it will deliver on the HDR quality for both contrast levels and color realism. However, it’s one thing to read that and its another thing to actually see the quality of the KS8000’s (and other 2016 SUHD TVs) high dynamic range at work when compared to what was available in the 2015 SUHD TVs. With possible peak brightness of more than 1100 nits and black levels capable of going as low as 0.02 nits against average white levels of 98 cd/m2 and even manage blacks as dark as 0.009 nits with UHD local dimming technology activated as well, this TV really creates a wide amount of dynamic range scales for all sorts of fine degrees of bright and dark in onscreen content. The resulting effect is stunning in native 4K ultra HD content with HDR mastering built into it and the HDR specs in the screen also work at making non-HDR or even non-4K content look quite impressive.

Furthermore, color performance in the KS8000 is downright great. The 2016 SUHD models have all seen their color capacities improve from how they were in 2015’s SUHD TVs and those older models were already excellent at creating vibrant color. While Samsung has been a bit tricky in not mentioning this TV’s Rec.2020 color bin coverage (it sits at only about 72%), the TV does still effectively cover more than 93% of the DCI-P3 color space and this is good enough for HDR certification and for the ability to genuinely claim that it offers up 10-bit color, with its 1.06 billion values instead of the 16.8 million of 8-bit color.

We should also note that the native refresh rate of the KS8000 is the same 120Hz of all the other SUHD TVs. Samsung has gone ahead with a “Motion Rate 240” label and in the KS9000 models it even claims “Supreme Motion Rate 240”, though we can hardly tell a difference between the two in action. While not as exaggerated as we’ve seen before, these added artificial refresh rate claims don’t impress us all that much. Native refresh is the important thing to keep in mind.

Finally, as we’d mentioned earlier, the upscaling technology in the KS8000 is downright superb, and now offers the added twist of working to enhance both non-4K content wonderfully but also native 4K content without HDR, since the TV not only upscales lower resolutions but also gives SDR video sources a slight to moderate makeover in contrast quality. The whole 2016 SUHD lineup does this well.

Connectivity

Connectivity specs in the KS8000 and the rest of its 2016 family of 4K TVs is just about identical to what was offered in the 2015 models. There is a total of 4 HDMI 2.0a ports with full HDCP 2.2, HDR and HEVC/VP9 capacity. There is also the added benefit of Samsung’s One Connect mini box available for this TV, which externalizes connectivity ports for easy replacement as new standards come along. The KS8000 also offers 3 USB ports and in this we see ourselves disappointed with the company for continuing to offer only USB 2.0 even in 2016. Would it really cost them that much more time and money to upgrade those ports to the more powerful USB 3.0?

Finally, there are the built-in WiFi and Ethernet connectivity of the KS8000, both of which are important for sharing content from the web to other devices and making sure the TV’s smart features, smart TV content apps and full web browsing capabilities all work smoothly.

Also, the KS8000 offers full compatibility with the H.265 and VP9 4K content compression codecs, meaning that access to pretty much all of today’s main sources of streaming web-based 4K content is a given as long as you have an internet connection of 15 to 25 Mbps.

Pricing

The Samsung KS8000 2016 SUHD TV sells on Amazon.com for $1,497.99 for the 55 inch model, $2,297.99 for the 65 inch model and for some odd reason, the 49 inch model has no price or availability listings either on the Amazon website or the Samsung TV website either. For the Curved version (KS8500) Click Here for Review.


Check the Price of the Samsung Electronics UN55KS8000FXZA 55" 4K Ultra HD 240MR Smart LED TV on Amazon

0.0 - No Reviews


Not so Great

To quickly summarize, the KS8000’s main defects are minor, consisting mostly of a lack of 3D support of any kind, poor viewing angles due to the lack of IPS Panel technology, and black performance that isn’t quite as impressive as we’d like in a 2016 SUHD TV. We also wish Samsung would add in USB 3.0 ports to their TVs and the addition of full-array LED backlighting would have been a great feature too.

Positives

• Excellent HDR specs
• Superb peak brightness
• Tizen has improved
• Physically beautiful
• Solid color performance

Negatives

• Weak viewing angles
• No 3D support
• Lacks USB 3.0
• We’d like full-array LED backlighting

Editor Rating
 
Features
A

 
Quality
A

 
User Friendliness
A-

 
Connectivity
A+

 
Price
A

Total Score
A-

Hover To Rate
User Rating
 
Features
B

 
Quality
B+

 
User Friendliness
B+

 
Connectivity
B+

 
Price
B

User Score
624 ratings
B+

You have rated this

Bottom Line
 

The Bottom Line for the KS8000 is the same as it was in our review of the KS9000. This is an excellent HDR 4K LCD TV, if you haven’t bought such a TV yet, then definitely go for this or the other 2016 SUHD models instead of for their 2015 cousins. However, if you already own a high-end 2015 4K TV and don’t care too much about the absolute latest in HDR technology, then you’re probably just fine with your existing TV for now.

Check the Price of the Samsung Electronics UN55KS8000FXZA 55" 4K Ultra HD 240MR Smart LED TV on Amazon

0.0 - No Reviews

 
155 comments
 
Leave a reply »

 
  • CRC
    April 9, 2016 at 8:00 pm

    Is it possible that they are not going to release a 49″ TV? At the moment, it is MIA.

    Also, can you quantify the poor off axis viewing angle. At what angle do you notice a difference? I saw one today on the display floor and It didn’t seem very noticeable, but that was with store lighting, saturated bright source content, and some horrible settings. Properly adjusted for a movie in a dark room, at what angle will I see the image start to wash out?

    Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      April 12, 2016 at 1:10 pm

      Hello there CRC, the off-axis viewing angle starts to get a bit poor, with a considerable drop in contrast in particular as of about 65 degrees from directly in front of the TV screen. And yes, as you say, this can be affected by content quality and ambient lighting, but only slightly. Furthermore, oddly enough, the KS8000 doesn’t come with an IPS screen. It uses VA technology instead I believe. This is what negatively affects its viewing angles.

      As for the 49 inch model of the KS8000, one is already available from online retailers and in-store as well I’d assume. We focused more on the larger models here but have edited to include mention of the 49 inch edition.

      Reply

      • CRC
        April 15, 2016 at 12:52 pm

        Thanks for the reply. Yes, I am starting to see the 49″ listed as well. I have decided to just get one and bring it home to try out. If the off viewing angle is not acceptable (but I expect that it will be) then I will return it. I would prefer to buy it from Costco, but it is not available there. From past experience, do you know how long it takes for Costco to carry new models of TV’s? They carry the JS8500 online, so I think it likely they will carry the KS8000 online also. Of course there is the possibility they will never carry it. How long do you think I would have to wait?

        Reply

    • Michael
      October 24, 2016 at 8:48 pm

      Really great review brother I was just curious if you watched any Ultra HD Blu Rays on the ks8000? and if so how bad was the light blooming I’ve had a very Rocky year so far when it comes to TVs I first purchased an open box 850 d Sony great colors but terrible blooming with HDR and light bleed went and got the 2016 M series from Vizio quite enjoyed the TV but returned it do to it only being an 8-bit panel and only having one HDR compatible HDMI port and finally went and got the Vizio P-Series and I really have enjoyed it the last 73 days the blacks with HDR are amazing butt last week I got a quarter-sized black spot in the lower Center corner of the panel and came to find out that it is a dead LED Zone and due to the fact that Best Buy has more or less discontinued it I wasn’t able to do a direct exchange for a new one long story short I ended up being able to get the ks8000 for a direct Exchange how would you say the black levels compared between the P-Series and the ks 8000 from Samsung?

      Reply

  • Jason
    April 10, 2016 at 10:39 am

    I’m trying to choose between this TV and the LG 55uh8500, I don’t watch too much tv in the dark. I game and have a 4k roku with Amazon and netflix accounts. Also I watch cable, and noticed little comments in the LGS review about upconverting? Will likely be in a well lit by day and night apartment living room. I notice a big price difference between the two units. I’m also not sure if I should take into account the HDR format war. I do have a Samsung tab/phone but I know LG makes nice products too.

    Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      April 12, 2016 at 12:54 pm

      Hi there Jason, Here is a repost of my review to your same comment in the UH8500 review. Thanks:

      The price issue is something to consider but if you’re looking for superior display quality, I’d recommend the KS8000 over the UH8500. LG has improved their 2016 LCD 4K TVs a lot from the lackluster 2015 models but they’re still not as good as Samsung’s SUHD TVs for this year. The UH8500 still suffers from weaker contrast than we’d like and its color performance is affected as a result. Furthermore, for an HDR TV (which the UH8500 also is) it’s performance is only decent at best, while the HDR quality of the KS8000 is superb.

      Reply

      • Ken Hielscher
        April 30, 2016 at 9:10 am

        Stephen
        Thanks for your candor and responses, as I am considering the KS8000 versus the (2015 mdl) 7090 unit.
        The 7090 is available at Sams club for around 1098 versus the 2800 price of the KS8000. The cost difference was driving me to the 7090.
        AS I do not own a 4K unit this expanded review/discussion just may persuade me to go with the newer model…your thoughts

        Reply

  • Mike
    April 10, 2016 at 4:46 pm

    So would you choose the js8500 for $400 cheaper over the ks8000 or go with the ks8000? I just want the better TV and the cost between the two doesn’t matter either way.

    Reply

    • CRC
      April 11, 2016 at 12:22 pm

      Unless you want 3D, the ks8000 is better is almost every other way. It strikes me as the TV the js8500 was trying to be, but just couldn’t quite make it.

      Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      April 12, 2016 at 12:50 pm

      Hello Mike, in that case you should definitely go with the KS8000 if cost is not your main concern. This TV is completely the superior of the two in the quality of its display technology, brightness, dimming and the quality of its high dynamic range most of all, which is the most notable improvement. It’s Tizen smart TV platform has also been improved and we think the color performance of the KS8000 is a step up from what was the case in the JS8500.

      Reply

    • Jennifer
      July 23, 2016 at 3:56 pm

      I have the JS8500 and it’s awesome TV. We tested side by side with my Friend”s KS8000 and we found the HDR looking the same on 4K UHD bluray movies like Allegiant Chappie The Revenant and test patterns plus the JS8500 has better automotion. We tested the TVs in low lit rooms.

      Reply

      • Talaat
        January 6, 2017 at 6:58 am

        hello jennefer , is the same picture you noticed on both ks8000 and js8500 only for hdr 4k movies or also for sdr 4k movies and 1080p and 720p movies

        Reply

  • Roger
    April 19, 2016 at 7:43 am

    I have heard concerns about light bleed in this model. Can you comment on this? I have been looking at the LG Oled for quite some time but this is much better for my budget and since I mostly watch satellite tv and play ps4 I may not need to spend the extra money.

    Reply

  • Mick Bracey
    April 25, 2016 at 4:01 am

    Hi Stephen
    Where would you rate the ks8000 against the Sony xd93

    Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      April 25, 2016 at 1:50 pm

      Hello there Mick. Between the KS8000 and the X930D from Sony, i’d argue that the superior TV is the Samsung model. Thier 2016 SUHD TVs truly are superb performers and the Sony models less so, though they’re great in most ways and the X940D in particular is excellent. For your KS8000 vs. X930D question, I’d say that the Samsung TV offers the far superior contrast level and a much higher quality of black level. It’s also a brighter TV on the whole. In fact, neither the X850D or the X930D seem to always effectively manage the minimum 1100 nit peak brightness of Ultra HD Premium standards. Don’t get me wrong, the X930D is a great 4K TV with excellent motion specs, superb color performance and a smart TV platform we really like but in general the display quality of the KS8000 is both brighter and darker, with better overall contrast and the same high quality of motion control specs.

      Reply

  • Orlando
    April 27, 2016 at 12:28 pm

    I am debating on one of the following TVs

    1. Vizio P-Seriess P55-C1
    or
    2. Samsung KS8000 55″
    or
    3. Sony XBR55850D

    Which would you choose and why? I likely will not be playing XBOX on it, but will watch Comcast Cable, lots of sports, mainly football and lots of 720p and 1080p movies.

    Sound is not important as I have a Sony 780 soundbar and 3D is NOT important. Picture quality and clarity are most important tome.

    Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      April 29, 2016 at 6:26 pm

      Hello Orlando,

      Between the three you mention, i’d definitely go for the KS8000 if price isn’t your biggest concern. On the other hand, I’d recommend the 55 inch P-Series if you’d like to save a bit of money and still receive an excellent picture quality experience. The 2016 SUHD TVs are great across the board and even the lower priced KS8000 and KS8500 (Which have nearly the same specs with the only real distinction being a lack of curvature in the KS8000) are some of the best 4K LCD TVs we’ve seen in 2016. Overall they’re somewhat superior to the P-Series though the Vizio model is also ecellennt with some fine 10-bit color and the second best HDR specs we’ve seen in 2016 so far.

      The Sony model isn’t bad either but it’s simply not as good a 4K TV overall as either the KS8000 or P-Series. In summary. for the best among those you list, go for the KS8000 but if you want to save a bit of money, go for the P-Series for a nearly as good picture quality.

      Reply

  • CRC
    April 28, 2016 at 3:31 pm

    I’m seeing some user comments complaining about the motion blur on the KS8000. I watch a lot of motorcycle racing and am concerned that I might be disappointed with this TV. Would the JS7000 be better for watching motorcycle racing? I’ve been waiting for the 49KS8000 to become available, but not that I can purchase it, I’m afraid that maybe it isn’t the right TV for me.

    Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      April 29, 2016 at 6:52 pm

      Hello CRC, the motion control technologies in the KS8000 model we reviewed all show as being truly excellent or at the very least very good. In the case of motion blur, we noticed excellent performance with both native 4K content and upscaled HD video action. I strongly doubt that this will be a problem in the KS8000. It performs better than the 2015 JS7000 on this front in fact.

      Reply

  • Mr Anderson
    April 28, 2016 at 8:22 pm

    Great review as always, you guys are the best with up to date coverage on the newest tv’s. I’m considering this tv but I’m a little concerned about the edge lit local dimming. I have an older tv with lots of blooming and flash lighting on the edges when dark scenes come up on movies and shows. It’s very distracting and just recently turned it off completely, although it did hurt my picture quality. Is there blooming and distracting edge lighting issues with the ks8000? We watch mostly in a dim lit living room at night (blue rays and 1080p content). Thanks for your help!

    Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      April 29, 2016 at 6:50 pm

      Hello Mr. Anderson. No, in our experience the KS8000 does not produce issues with light blooming even when the screen is completely black. In fact, the black uniformity of this TV is excellent from what we’ve been able to observe. Of course it is also always possible that some specific units offer a different experience and consumers mention this on review sites or pages like Amazon.com.

      Reply

  • Jacks jack
    April 30, 2016 at 2:15 am

    Hi! Can it be hung on the wall? Thanks, Jack

    Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      May 1, 2016 at 3:59 am

      Hello Jack, of course it can. All 4K TVs from major brands are mountable to walls and the flat screen of the KS8000 lends itself much better to this than a curved display like that of the KS8500 or the KS9500 does.

      Reply

  • J Dennehy
    May 9, 2016 at 4:04 pm

    Stephen, I just bought a Samsung UN49KS8000 4K Ultra HD Smart LED TV (2016)…..

    Is it safe and is my privacy at risk? I don’t want anyone to have access to what I do or say when I’m enjoying a TV show. Please provide me with a definitive answer, before I return the TV.

    Reply

    • Stephen
      Stephen
      May 9, 2016 at 8:51 pm

      Hello there J Dennehy, all smart TVs are theoretically capable of being hacked though its very unlikely. What is likely however is that Samsung is monitoring your viewing preferences and o